Here is the opinion in Navajo Nation v. Arizona Dept. of Economic Security:An excerpt:The Navajo Nation (“the Nation”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment finding good cause to deviate from the placement preferences set forth in the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901 to 1963 (2006), and allowing the child (“Z.”) to remain with his current non-relative, non-Indian adoptive placement. We affirm. The juvenile court properly found good cause to deviate from ICWA placement preferences because the placement family provided good care for Z., Z. had attached and bonded with the family, Z. would suffer severe distress if he was removed from that placement, the placement family would expose Z. to his Navajo culture, and the placement family had been approved to adopt Z. While the interest of the Nation and the Congressionally-presumed interest of Z. in maintaining his heritage weighed against a finding of good cause to deviate from ICWA’s preferences, on this record we cannot say the court erred in weighing all these interests.
(UPDATED 4/4/2025) we will update as we publish at AMERICAN INDIAN ADOPTEES WEBSITE - some issues with blogger are preventing this
Thursday, August 30, 2012
UPDATED Another violation of ICWA in Arizona
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
click
Contact Trace
CALLED HOME: Book Contributors - republished in 2025
CALLED HOME: Book Contributors : We are honored that these adoptees (or relatives of adoptees) contributed to CALLED HOME: Suzie ...

-
Published on Sep 28, 2013 This 40-minute documentary explains the reason for and the process of creating and implementing ...
-
By Mary Charles I somehow don't believe the intention was for us (adoptees) to find our homes using DNA. But when I came across t...
-
Editor NOTE: This is one of our most popular posts so we are reblogging it. If you do know where Michael Schwartz is, please leave a com...
-
Port Gamble S'Klallam Obtain Full Control Over Child Welfare Matters Posted on March 29, 2012 After a decade-long effort in conju...
-
South Carolina court drops contempt charge against Dusten Brown Dusten Brown and the Cherokee Nation rea...
-
By: Shannon Logan Feb 07, 2014 Leland Morrill was estranged from h...
-
By Melanie Payne ( mpayne@news-press.com ) August 15, 2010 Alexis Stevens liked to describe herself as a model citizen. She was adopted fr...
-
By Trace L Hentz, blog editor I have often wondered about how we adoptees were affected by our adoptions, as far as our mental health. (I ...
-
Capobiancos Sue Dusten Brown for Nearly Half a Million in Fees Suzette Brewer September 25, 2013 As Matt and Melanie...
-
Trace wishes to thank Loud Blood for her wonderful guest blog... (excerpt from upcoming book, " Loud Blood" ) I have been f...
A direct violation of both federal and international law. They charge other countries with genocide when they do that.
ReplyDeleteYes, anonymous, that is correct but in their mind, American Indian culture isn't important when we know it is... the AP story does go into more detail. It didn't say it was another Mormon adoption - it might just be.
ReplyDelete