BLOGGER changed, not allowing us to UPDATE this back-up blog

(UPDATED 726/2025) issues with blogger are preventing this
Showing posts with label #WHYICWAMATTERS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #WHYICWAMATTERS. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2025

North Dakota closer to state ICWA

BISMARCK — With the passage this week of a budget bill amendment that would allocate funding to specialized courts throughout the state, the Northeast Judicial District is one step closer to establishing an Indian Child Welfare Act Court in North Dakota.

The $125,292 allocation was previously removed from SB 2002, but after being asked to reconsider, the Education and Environment Division of House Appropriations added it back into the budget during a Tuesday committee hearing.

"If this is implemented, we would be the first ICWA Court in North Dakota — really addressing those unique needs of Native American families and upholding the intent of the law, which is to preserve those cultural connections and family unity whenever possible," said Heather Traynor, who works for the North Dakota Supreme Court's court improvement program.  She testified in favor of the funding allocation.

Though they make up approximately 6% of the state's population, Indigenous youth account for 26% of its foster care population, Traynor said.  There have been many efforts throughout the last 15 years to determine how this disproportionate rate can be reduced.

Traynor, and others, believe ICWA court could be an answer.

The ICWA, a federal law established in the 1970s, was a response to the "unwarranted removal of Indian children from their families and tribal communities in alarming numbers," according to the ICWA Law Center, an Indigenous legal services nonprofit organization.

Highlights of the act include recognizing tribal sovereignty, preserving Indigenous families and recognizing tribal and familial connections.

It requires higher levels of engagement to keep families together and, if that is not possible, to keep them within or otherwise connected to their communities, Traynor said.

The act describes placement preferences for Indigenous children as the following, in order of preference:

  1. A member of the child's extended family;
  2. an Indigenous foster home licensed, approved or specified by the child's tribe;
  3. an Indigenous foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indigenous licensing authority; or
  4. an institution for children that is approved by a tribe, or operated by an Indigenous organization, and has a program suitable for the child's needs.

The ICWA does not apply to all Indigenous youth. Rather, it applies to those who either are enrolled with a tribe or are eligible for enrollment, Traynor said.

"With ICWA, we look to protect the best interests of Native American children, and prevent unnecessary removal," she said. "That's why it was put into place. But it's important that we focus on these efforts once they are removed, so that they can maintain that cultural connection with their Native American families and communities."

Across the 23 states that have established their own ICWA courts as an intervention tool, the goal of timely permanency has been found to be more attainable, Traynor said.

Permanency is a living situation that is permanent and stable, and ideally preserves existing familial connections, according to the Child Welfare website, an official website of the Children's Bureau and Child Welfare Information Gateway.

Benefits of an ICWA court would include the opportunity for a more family-based approach with earlier intervention and consistency in scheduling that would allow for a tribal presence at hearings, Traynor said.

SOURCE:  https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/north-dakota/north-dakotas-first-indian-child-welfare-act-court-could-be-established-in-northeast-judicial-district

Thursday, January 9, 2025

President Carter’s Native American report card

A look back on the 39th U.S. President’s legacy and policies regarding Indigenous people

PLAINS, G.A – Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter recently passed away at the age of 100 at his home on December 19, 2024. Carter leaves behind a complex legacy among Americans and Indian Country alike. Elected in 1977, Carter oversaw many challenges throughout his presidency including stagflation, the Iranian Hostage crisis, and an energy crisis. Triumphs of Carter’s presidency include negotiating the Camp David Accords, signing the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act and many major pieces of legislation that continue to benefit Indigenous peoples today.

Born in the small town of Plains, GA, Carter was born on what was formally the homelands of the Mvskoke people. Carter was the first U.S. President born in a hospital, and remained a resident of Plains for most of his life. He served in the U.S. Senate and served a term as Georgia’s governor, however one of his most well-known professions was peanut farming.

In Indian Country Carter is most well known for signing the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA). The former protects Native American children by giving adoption preference to their families, then their tribe if there are no family members available. The latter gave Native Americans the freedom to exercise their traditional religions by worshiping through ceremonial and traditional rites.

President Carter’s legacy among Indigenous people is also known to Panamainians. In 1978 Carter successfully negotiated the Torrijos-Carter Treaties, which transferred ownership of the Panama Canal to the Nation of Panama after years of tension.

U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland (Laguna Pueblo) shared that Carter was a man of service, and left a deep impact on Indian Country.

“President Jimmy Carter exemplified what it means to live a life of faith and service to others,” Secretary Haaland said. “His love for and conservation of our shared public lands leaves a tremendous legacy, and I am grateful that the Department will continue to honor his work at the Jimmy Carter National Historical Park for generations to come. My heartfelt condolences go out to his family and the global community as we all mourn this selfless public servant.” 

In a public statement, Muscogee (Creek) Nation Principal Chief David Hill expressed condolences for the former president’s family. The statement reads,

The Muscogee Nation is saddened to learn of the passing of President Jimmy Carter, a dedicated and selfless public servant and statesman, who lived a full life of 100 years.

President Carter signed two monumental pieces of legislation for Indian Country into law in 1978, with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act. ICWA has been an enduring protection for Native families and children and the AIRF, gave our ceremonial grounds and others the confidence to hold onto and perpetuate their traditions.

MVTO President Carter for your contributions and your compassion and commitment to the betterment of your fellow man.”

A six day funeral observance is currently underway celebrating the former president’s life.  The observance began in Americus, Georgia where Carter was born, and made its way to his hometown in Plains, then made its way to Atalanta where he served as governor.  Carter’s remains will travel to Washington where a national service happened on Jan. 9.

Monday, December 9, 2024

California law helps tribes keep kids out of foster care. A new court ruling strengthens their hand

 


Indian Child Welfare Act recently upheld

The issue of child custody and Native Americans has long been a point of painful history in the United States. In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which regulates the removal and out-of-home placement of Native children. A July 2024 report from the U.S. Department of the Interior found that over 900 children died nationwide in forced boarding schools from 1819 to 1969.

 

READ: 

https://ictnews.org/news/california-law-helps-tribes-keep-kids-out-of-foster-care-a-new-court-ruling-strengthens-their-hand-

Saturday, November 9, 2024

What is Coming?

A quote from the book WHAT JUST HAPPENED, which includes my interviews with John Trudell

By Trace Hentz, blog editor

I had emails right after the election (Trump won) and I was asked about how this could impact Indigenous Sovereign Tribal Nations here in the US.

Trump obviously doesn't know our history.  There is no sign that he cares, unless it can make him money or gain him prestige and power.

His first term was defined as SURREAL

So, yes, it could impact every one of us in some way - for good or for bad.   For one, tribal nations will not have a seat at the table, judging by Trump's last term.  (Sadly, the Department of the Interior will no longer have a Native (Secretary Deb Haaland) running it.)  Trump will not convene any Tribal Summits, even though we are sovereign and deserve a voice and a seat at the table.

How about his type of corruption?  His financial ties and connections to oil and gas industries in exchange for permits to DRILL DRILL DRILL could impact every state, especially Alaska!


“The policies enacted during President Trump’s first term played a crucial role in this growth and innovation. By reducing regulatory burdens, his administration allowed energy companies to focus on production and innovation rather than navigating an endless stream of rules from Washington bureaucrats. In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration has been far more aggressive than even the Obama administration in undermining domestic oil and gas production,” the alliance said. MORE HERE


BACKWARDS?  Yup, in reverse, we will be back to THE GREAT WHITE FATHER making new rules and breaking and bending treaties, again. 

(From Rex Tellerson, to Jeff Sessions, to Wilbur Ross, every Cabinet member he chose in his first term proved their incompetence or corruption.  Trump's choices first term: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_cabinet_of_Donald_Trump)

SCARY?

Another possibility is Trump would terminate tribes, like what happened over 40+ years ago.  I remember when I was editor of the Pequot Times that Trump played a part in the denial of federal recognition for the Eastern Pequot and the Schaghticoke tribes in Connecticut.  Both tribes had tried over many years to petition the federal government for recognition, and regain the land they deserved to be declared their reservations.  (At one point there were over 200 tribes in that situation, stuck in limbo and petitioning for federal recognition.) 

Remember that every treaty ever written was broken.

LINK: https://www.archives.gov/research/native-americans/bia/termination

Termination ended federal recognition of affected tribes and the federal aid and services that came with that recognition.  It also ended federal trust status for affected reservations and the protections granted by such status.  In many cases, termination meant the transfer of federal jurisdiction over criminal and civil matters on reservations to state authorities as well.   (REMEMBER: House Concurrent Resolution 108 called for termination “at the earliest possible time” of all American Indian tribes in California, Florida, New York, and Texas, as well as termination for specific tribes in other states, including “the Flathead Tribe of Montana, the Klamath Tribe of Oregon, the Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin, the Potowatamie Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, and those members of the Chippewa Tribe who are on the Turtle Mountain Reservation, North Dakota.”)

It was devastating, beyond what anyone could have imagined. (Like the Dawes Act!)

It took the tribes like Grand Ronde in Oregon many years to be recognized again, to be regarded and treated as Sovereign - costing these tribes their time and money and untold tragedy. 

You see, it never ends. Domination never ends. Their demand for land and what is on the land, or under the land, never ends.

In 2020 I compiled a non-fiction book WHAT JUST HAPPENED concerning Trump's new presidency, because I had friends who were literally scared to death.  The instability of the man, the crime boss Mafia mentality he displayed, the pathological liar who was our new president, this new phenomena was called TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, or TDS.  People were knocked off balance and literally in fear, scared.  For good reason. 

I know it's only one branch of government, yes, but in the past, almost all past presidents were a danger to us, and what is coming, has yet to be determined.  

As far as future adoptees, ICWA is still our federal law.  But sadly, even that could change!

With the election of President Donald Trump to serve in his second term, the National Indian Child Welfare Association released the following statement:

As the 2024 election results are nearly complete, we recognize there is much at stake for our communities. At times, the campaign rhetoric was divisive and raised important questions about how a transition in leadership might impact our communities.  While leadership changes can often bring uncertainty and even anxiety, we have prepared for this and are already planning how we will organize, educate, and advocate for the needs and rights of Native children and families and the protection of tribal sovereignty.

NICWA has navigated national leadership changes going back to the 1980s, and we understand how to strategically and diligently advocate for the rights and protection of Native children and families in changing political environments.  During some of the most challenging times, we have found ways to protect and even advance resources and rights for Native children and families.  This included expanding our network of allies—both Native and non-Native—and finding new ways to communicate the importance of laws like the Indian Child Welfare Act, which are crucial to the well-being of our communities.

NICWA values seeking opportunities to work in a bipartisan manner and designing strategies that ensure support from both parties.  Our strength is the relationships we have within our communities, leadership, and each other.  We will continue our fight for the protection of Native children and families with you as our most valuable allies and partners.

 **

Hey!  We're SMART!

Let's keep watch.  Like Trudell told us many times in many ways: we are resilient, sacred and ancient.  We are not going anywhere.



Thursday, November 7, 2024

New Law Helps CA Tribes Keep Kids Out of Foster Care | SoCal Matters

Native American children in California’s foster care system are frequently placed in non-relative, non-native homes. Although the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, ensuring child welfare agencies investigate ancestry, contested cases still emerge.  This story explores the long-standing issues and the ongoing fight to protect Native foster care rights in California. Read the full story.

TRANSCRIPT: https://calmatters.org/justice/2024/10/new-law-california-tribes-foster-care-video/

 

Thursday, February 15, 2024

Montana Foster Care and #ICWA

 

 

Native American children make up more than a third of the foster care caseload in Montana, despite representing less than 10% of the state’s child population. While there’s a broad consensus among child welfare experts that this outsized representation is a problem, there exists no collective strategy to address it. The Montana Free Press series Keeping the Kids, supported by a data fellowship through the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism, explores the available data and highlights examples of local solutions around the state. This article focuses on MTFP’s analysis of the available data and some of the factors contributing to racial disproportionality in foster care. 

READ

If poverty exists, and it does in Indian Country, there will always be a problem... let's solve poverty... Trace

RELATED

How we calculated disproportionality in Montana foster care

In October of last year, Montana Free Press started investigating why Montana’s foster care caseload, which was at least 38% Native American in 2022, is so racially skewed. Here’s how data shaped our reporting.

Monday, January 29, 2024

The Tribal Training and Certification Partnership at UMD trains social workers who work with Native American families



The Tribal Training and Certification Partnership at UMD trains social workers who work with Native American families.

In 1978, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in response to Native American children being removed from their homes and placed in foster care at disproportionate rates.  Despite regulation, those rates have remained high.  Today in Minnesota, Native children are still 16 times more likely than white children to be placed in foster care.

To address the issue, a two-day training program on ICWA was formed at UMD: The Tribal Training and Certification Partnership (TTCP) trains incoming and current child protection workers in Minnesota to work with Native families better. “Since January of 2020, we have trained about 1600 county social workers,” said Larissa Littlewolf, associate director of the TTCP, and member of the Turtle Clan and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe.

The training is part of the Minnesota Child Welfare Training Academy. It begins with a historical context of the US government's interactions with Native families that have led to decades of trauma, followed by lessons on how to comply with ICWA. Eventually, all county social workers in Minnesota who work with child protection cases will be mandated to go through the training.

“We’re really working on the spirit of ICWA,” Littlewolf said. “Building relationships with families, meeting them where they’re at.”


Related articles:

Preserving Native families
Transforming child welfare
Using an indigenous lens
Federal grant to train tribal child welfare workers
Heart work: Training social workers to keep Native children home (MPR story)

Friday, December 29, 2023

Top Stories of 2023: Indigenous Rights Upheld

A selection of The Imprint’s most impactful stories from the past year

Native leaders said the high court’s decision to uphold ICWA “will be felt across generations.” Photo by Rosemary Stephens.

In 2018, the future of the Indian Child Welfare Act was put in jeopardy by a case that would come to be known as Brackeen v. Haaland. A federal district court judge ruled that the 45-year-old law known as ICWA was unconstitutional in its entirety. As the case progressed, many supporters of the law — which is designed to maintain the bonds between Native children and their families and tribes — feared that the U.S. Supreme Court would gut or erase ICWA.

This June, the court did the opposite in a 7-2 ruling that strongly affirmed the Indian Child Welfare Act’s constitutionality.

“The bottom line is that we reject all of petitioners’ challenges to the statute, some on the merits and others for lack of standing,” wrote Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

The Imprint’s five years of coverage on the Brackeen case includes Nancy Marie Spears’ reporting on the arguments considered by the Supreme Court and the prayers and protests outside that day.  And check out The Imprint Weekly Podcast episode from the week after the court’s decision for more insight from several leading experts on ICWA and tribal law.

But Spears’ reporting in 2023 went well beyond the Supreme Court case.  She profiled the Indigenous practices that ICWA is meant to protect, such as the My Two Aunties program developed by a group of tribes in Southern California.  Her recent three-part series, Born of History, explores the ways in which the colonization of the past, and the present constraints of federal funding, make it difficult for many tribes to make full use of ICWA’s protections. 

SOURCE:

https://imprintnews.org/best-of-2023/top-stories-2023-indigenous-rights-upheld/246657

Saturday, November 11, 2023

The Lost Children: Dakota Searchlight investigation into ICWA in SD

WOW! This is excellent coverage! - Trace


SD Searchlight's Makenzie Huber and Argus Leader's Annie Todd interview Governor Kristi Noem, DSS Secretary Matt Althoff and Tribal Secretary Dave Flute about the state's indigenous child welfare laws on Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2023 at South Dakota State Capitol in Pierre, South Dakota.  
Photo: Samantha Laurey / Argus Leader

Forty-five years after ICWA passed, South Dakota has one of the highest rates of Native American child removals in the United States. 

An Argus Leader/South Dakota Searchlight investigation examined the issues Native families and children face inside South Dakota’s child welfare system. Below, you can find our findings and stories compiled.

 READ: https://eu.argusleader.com/story/news/2023/11/09/indian-child-welfare-act-argus-leader-south-dakota-searchlight-investigation-stories-native-american/71516934007/
 

Tuesday, November 7, 2023

Challenges and Resilience (free zoom lecture)

Zoom (Cook County Higher Education) 300 West 3rd Street #57 , Duluth, Minnesota 55604

Saturday, September 9, 2023

Assimilation Vacation?


In the 1960s, Zepeda’s grandmother protected her from being taken away on an “assimilation vacation” in the San Francisco Bay Area, where children would “learn how other families live” and potentially be adopted away from their rightful families.  Zepeda and her siblings lived with a constant fear of being taken from their home, often being told by their grandmother: “You better behave because if you don’t, white people are going to take you away.”  It wasn’t until 1978 that the Indian Child Welfare Act prohibited the removal of Indigenous children from their families.

Further alienating Indigenous people from their roots was the repression of their spiritual beliefs and practices going back to the 1850s.  Until the American Indian Religious Freedom Act passed in 1978, many people practiced secretly while participating in mainstream religion.  For example, Zepeda’s great grandfather was a tribal medicine person, but also an altar boy for a Catholic priest.

Owning land contributes to economic and societal stability as well as long term wealth. While the United States government was obliged for many generations to honor treaties and debts with native tribes, the Termination Act of 1953 sought to disband tribes, sell their lands, and relocate American Indians. For Zepeda, this meant that she was no longer Indian and was not eligible to receive services from the Indian health clinic.  The policy also had long-term and devastating economic consequences for tribal communities who lost their land.

In 1983 with Hardwick v. United States Government, Zepeda was considered Indian once again. “We have reorganized and reestablished ourselves.” Now, she lives again on the land that had been her grandma’s.

Understanding Indigenous Communities to Support Their Health Needs

READ MORE

VIDEO:  http://placemattersoregon.com/ 

For thousands of years, the Klamath Tribes have had a deep physical and spiritual connection to southern Oregon. But in 1954, the U.S. government took over their tribal lands there. The trauma of losing their land, and the racism and discrimination they confronted in the years after, are at the root of health challenges that still affect tribal members at higher rates than other ethnic and racial groups in Oregon.  Monica YellowOwl, a prevention specialist for Klamath Tribal Health and Family Services, and other tribal members are working to restore their people’s connection to the land in order to improve their physical and mental health. “We don’t always want to be seen as the traumatized Indians. We want to be seen as resilient Indians, powerful people, connected to our homeland, practicing our traditions and our cultures,” Monica says. 

Place Matters Oregon is an effort of the Oregon Health Authority to get people talking about how place affects our health—as individuals and as a community. Check out the link above to explore more connections between place and health and join the conversation. 

 

Wednesday, August 2, 2023

Indigenous Mom Whose Daughter Was Murdered Granted Custody of 4-Year-Old Granddaughter for Second Time

Arlene Ballot and granddaughter Chanel. Photo:

www.CommunityX.com


Despite being granted custody again, Arlene Ballot was ordered to wait until July 31 to begin a three-week transition of custody

As Arlene Ballot prepares to finally pick up her murdered daughter’s child from the couple who have had her for most of her 4 years of life, she can be forgiven for being cautiously optimistic about actually bringing Chanel home.

The July 17 decision to award Ballot custody is the second time the Selawik Tribal Court in Alaska has ordered Chanel, an indigenous child, to be returned to her grandmother.  Nikki Richman, who is not related to Chanel, gained temporary custody through the child’s father, Eric Rustad, who murdered Chanel’s mother Kristen Huntington in January 2020.

"This is three years too long. They shouldn't be allowed to keep dragging it on, abusing the court system to keep this child from her grandmother," Antonia Commack, Huntington’s friend since childhood who is also involved in the legal battle, tells PEOPLE. "I knew in my heart that being quiet was wrong and it was time to speak up."

And a recent Supreme Court decision might add some extra weight going forward.

The week before the latest Selawik Tribal Court ruling, The Supreme Court upheld the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which says the first priority is to put the child in the care of a member of their extended family. If that is not possible, the child should be placed with a member of their tribe. The third option is to look for "other Indian families." Only after those three options have been exhausted will they be eligible to be placed with a non-Native family. 

In their December ruling, the Selawik Tribal Court found tribal elder Ballot able to meet the child’s needs and, in addition, "can better connect her to her Native culture." 

KEEP READING

Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Ned Blackhawk on How Native People shaped U.S. History (podcast)

 Ned Blackhawk on How Native People shaped U.S. History 

 July 5, 2023, CT WNPR 
 

This podcast, we are exploring the central role that Native peoples have played in the development of the United States, while facing legal discrimination that goes all the way back to the country's founding documents.  Professor of Law Matthew L.M. Fletcher gives us the context around the Supreme Court's recent ruling on the Indian Child Welfare Act.  And Ned Blackhawk discusses his new book, The Rediscovery of America: Native Peoples and the Unmaking of U.S. History, which tells the history of the United States, emphasizing how Native Americans have been essential to determining that history.

CLICK HERE

Wednesday, July 12, 2023

Looking Beyond Haaland v. Brackeen

 


The ACLU submitted an amicus brief in the case, and has been following the issue closely because of the profound threat it poses to Indigenous communities, particularly federally recognized tribes in the United States. In light of this victory at the Supreme Court, we are now urging states to take action and introduce or strengthen existing state-level ICWA protections.

READ

Thursday, June 15, 2023

OMG - VICTORY! ICWA stands


 I CANNOT STOP CRYING!  -- HAPPY EDITOR Trace

 

ICWA UPHELD BY U.S. SUPREME COURT


WASHINGTON — The Indian Child Welfare Act lives on courtesy of a 7 -2 high court decision — a much better outcome than anxious tribal advocates had hoped.  Justice Amy Coney Barrett writes for the majority.  Justice Neil Gorsuch provides strong concurring opinion.  Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissent.  Read all 133 pages here.

Tribal sovereignty, American Indian children and families widely viewed as biggest winners. 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-376_7l48.pdf Here is the full court decision. Note - this was 7-2 and the dissenters were Alito and Thomas citing state’s rights. 

Tuesday, June 13, 2023

Part 6: WHAT IF WE LOST ICWA: SOUTH DAKOTA

By Trace L Hentz, blog editor and adoptee

If we lost ICWA, let's look at South Dakota.  How are they doing?  Terrible!  Also not good, I have posted on this website many times their failures to protect Native kids from predators called social workers and missionaries.

Why ICWA matters there seems pretty obvious: Kids are screwed without it.

LIKE:  Why SD lawmakers won't be studying Indigenous child welfare this year


The kids are not alright: Little progress on welfare of Native children in South Dakota 

Keeping families together

(excerpt) 

 One of the commission’s recommendations implemented by the legislature was to address kinship placements. Kinship placements refers to keeping children with relatives, which Mousseau said can minimize the trauma experienced by the child.

Following the implementation of preference for kinship placements, DSS found that there was an increase of 25% of such placements for all children between July of 2004 and June of 2005. 


 

According to data requested by Foster, there are still large gaps of the number of children, Native and non-Native, that are placed with relatives.

During the session, Democratic Representative Peri Pourier introduced House Bill 1229 to address such placements. The bill died in the House Judiciary committee.

Mousseau said that kinship placements are important to the long-term wellbeing of children, especially when it comes to delinquency and recidivism.

“It is a practice in social work that has been shown to have amazing effects,” Mousseau said. “And we wanted all the children of South Dakota to have the opportunity to be placed with their relatives. That didn’t even make it out of committee.”

From poverty to prison

Data from the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect shows that in 2020, 95% of Native children affected by maltreatment were experiencing neglect compared to 86% of their non-Native peers. The data also showed that Native children face higher rates of abandonment and parents with substance abuse issues.

“Being born and raised in one of the most poorest counties in the United States, I can tell you that neglect looks a lot like poverty,” Pourier told House lawmakers on Wednesday.

South Dakota is home to some of the poorest counties in the country, many of which are on tribal land.

Pourier and Mousseau say the impact of poverty and neglect in childhood connect directly to crime and the overflowing prisons in South Dakota.

“South Dakota is funding more prisons because there’s a need but we go further upstream, there’s that need because of policies to remove children that dates back, which is why ICWA came into effect in 1978 and it has been in effect since,” Mousseau said.

As of January 31, 2023, Native American women outnumbered women of other races in South Dakota’s prisons. Additionally, nearly 33% of the male inmates in state prisons are Native American.  

 Mousseau said addressing the disproportionate rates of Native children in foster care, specifically those not placed with kin, can better address issues of crime and substance abuse.

“As you can imagine being removed from your family and being placed outside of your family, which a lot of Indian children are, that’s traumatic. That has dramatic effects on somebody who has to experience it and their children, right, their brains are still developing there,” Mousseau explained. “And we know from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study that, you know, those early traumatic experiences in children’s lives leads to negative health outcomes, run ins with the law, you know, substance use. Look up the ACEs study, that that has been foundational.”

KEEP READING 

  READ:

The Lost Bird of Wounded Knee - South Dakota Public Broadcasting

 

 

COLORADO

Congress originally enacted ICWA after learning of the large number of American Indian children being removed from their households into non-tribal families and institutions.

 

to be continued

Wednesday, June 7, 2023

#ICWA verdict looms

When it comes to championing the health of Indigenous children in the United States, few pieces of legislation possess the profound significance of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). It is not merely a dry legal document, but a lifeline of cultural health for Indigenous nations and countless children in the foster care system.

In the coming weeks, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is expected to release its decision on Haaland vs Brackeen, a case that challenges the constitutionality of the ICWA.  The plaintiffs, a non-Indigenous Texan couple named Chad and Jennifer Brackeen, claim that the ICWA's preference for placing Indigenous children with foster parents from their tribal nations discriminates against non-Indigenous individuals who wish to adopt Indigenous children.

Proponents of the ICWA, which include 486 tribal nations, assert the law’s preference for Indigenous families promotes cultural well-being and is based on the political status of tribes, rather than the social construct of race. According to the Native American Rights Fund (NARF), “The ICWA does this by upholding family integrity and stability and by keeping Indian children connected to their community and culture. The ICWA also reaffirms the inherent rights of tribal nations to be involved in child welfare matters involving their citizens.”

Samantha Maltais, a member of the Aquinnah Wampanoag tribe, ICWA advocate and a third-year student at Harvard Law School, shares this perspective. 

“Tribes have been and always will be sovereign nations. Their status as such pre-dates America’s founding and its earliest formulations of what race is. To misunderstand this truth not only threatens the welfare of Native children today, but could also undermine the ways we write federal Indian laws and policies for future generations to come,” she said.

READ HERE
 


click

Contact Trace

Name

Email *

Message *

NO MORE UPDATES

GO TO:  https://blog.americanindianadoptees.com/  for updates and news. THIS BLOG cannot be updated...