OUR HISTORY: Lost Children of the Indian Adoption Projects: Seed Beads and Porcupine Quills: the first pair of earrings I made
REBLOG from 2011 (BACK UP BLOG)
No one knew what ancestry I had
growing up. It mattered more to me than it did to the family who
adopted me. As adoptees grow up, we realize we are a mystery; sadly our
adoptive family may not know anything or share anything with us about
our true identity. That is a hard way to live, not a good way to live.
It hurts when people call you a bastard or orphan. It happened to me
often – I was asked why I was adopted. I didn’t know the answer.
How could I know? I was relying on lies and half-truths, like it was
better I didn’t know the truth about me and my mother. I hated the way I
was treated: like I was someone who did not deserve to know the truth,
as if it should not matter to me!
I did follow my spirit when I
started to make beaded jewelry, long before I knew I had any Indian
blood. I still have the first pair of earrings I made when I was 20.
Something drew me to seed beads and porcupine quills. Blood is embedded
with our genetic code. No one can alter that. I didn’t know about my
Shawnee ancestry until I was almost 40.
Here is a something else to consider: “…Before Europeans arrived, Indian education taught children how to thrive.
Social education taught responsibilities to the extended family and the
clan, band, or tribe. Vocational education taught about child rearing,
home management, farming, hunting, gathering, fishing, and so forth.
Children learned about their place in the cosmos through stories and
ceremonies. Traditional Indian education emphasized learning by
application and imitation, not by memorizing information…” This is from Path of Many Journeys, The Benefits of Higher Education for Native People and Communities, published in February 2007.
So Indian Country taught by example. Children watched and learned. I wanted to learn the peyote stitch, so I call this an interest
by instinct and blood. When I think back, I prayed while I beaded. Each
bead I strung, I would pray. No one in my adoptive family ever said to
do this. No one taught me or encouraged me to bead. My first husband
actually discouraged it since he said I wouldn’t make money selling
them. He missed the point. I made this jewelry to give away as gifts.
Edie, my adoptive mother, often wore hers to church.
I did a
radio interview on Sunday Sept. 25 (See Interviews & Readings 2011
on the left sidebar) and a friend asked me to answer this on air: “If
you love someone you want to know everything about them… Why don’t
adoptive parents want to know everything about their child?” (Since we
ran out of time, I was not able to answer this.)
Here is my answer:
I think some adoptive parents did and do want to know. I know some were
told personal details in meetings with social workers and lawyers. (For
example, Edie saw paperwork on my brother and saw his real name in the
1950s.) Before the 1950s, the adoption system believed in openness so
adoptive parents had more details about blood and the child’s birth
family; this was the era of eugenics and fears of “Bad Seed” in certain
children put up for adoption. Openness changed when the adoptive family
started to demand total privacy in adoption, obviously to calm their
anxiety and fears of losing a child they adopted. To seal the deal,
adoption records were closed in most states so baby and birthmother
would never meet or be able to know each other. We know some parents
spent thousands of dollars to adopt a baby (or babies) and didn’t want
to ever lose that child. We also know social workers created stories and
myths so adoptees would appear perfect and very smart. Imagine the
disappointment if a child starts to act anxious or traumatized and “acts
out” over this mystery they are forced to accept for life. A few
adoptees told me they heard details growing up that were later found to
be lies, especially about ancestry.
Another question was: Do adoptive parents disown children if they open their adoption and find their birthfamily?
Yes. It happens frequently.
State
systems and religion-based adoption groups still control information
and secrecy with sealed records. Secrecy prevents future reunions.
Secrecy would also protect some birthmothers from future judgment or
scandals concerning their immorality. We also know that information
collected was purposefully vague to prevent adoptees from finding their
birthparents or vice versa.
Why adoptive parents do not tell
adoptees anything is simply their preference, and their belief that we
are theirs legally. They don’t believe blood matters. This is a very
flawed way of thinking. I am living proof that blood matters greatly.
No comments:
Post a Comment
tell us your thoughts!