Tribes’ Statement re: Brackeen v. Zinke Decision
STATEMENT REGARDING RULING STRIKING DOWN THE INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT
We strongly disagree and are deeply disappointed with Judge O’Connor’s decision in Brackeen v. Zinke in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas striking
down the Indian Child Welfare Act, four decades after it was enacted. We
remain steadfast in our commitment to defend the constitutionality of
ICWA by all available means for one simple reason: If ICWA is struck
down in whole or in part, the victims will be our children and our
families, Native children and Native families.
The
apparent goal of Plaintiffs’ litigation is an extreme one — to separate
children from their parents. Before ICWA, as many as one-third of all
tribal children were forcibly removed from their families and their
communities by state governments. Thorough and objective analysis of the
systematic removal of Indian children from Indian homes found many
removals were wholly unjustified. These policies devastated tribal
communities and we refuse to go back to those darker days. We are
heartened by the support of so many states that stand shoulder to
shoulder with us in this litigation to protect families.
We
are in consultation with our legal counsel and exploring all available
options. Rest assured, we consider the trial level decision today as
one part of a long process. In the interim, we will seek a stay of the
decision until higher courts have an opportunity to review it. We will
continue to work in state courts throughout the country to ensure the
protections of ICWA for Native children, families, and tribes. We
strongly believe that, in the end, our rights protected by the Indian
Child Welfare Act will be affirmed and reinforced.
- Principal Chief Bill John Baker, Cherokee Nation
- Chairman Robert Martin, Morongo Band of Mission Indians
- Chairman Tehassi Hill, Oneida Nation
- President Fawn Sharp, Quinault Indian Nation
No comments:
Post a Comment
tell us your thoughts!