• Easter House charged with violation of Indian Child Welfare Act; baby returned to mother
1995
In 1995, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota filed a petition seeking to invalidate the adoption of a three-month old infant boy. The parents had planned to put their son up for adoption because of financial problems, but then changed their mind after he was born. After returning home from the hospital with her son, the mother signed the consent form and reluctantly gave her child to Easter House after repeated calls from the agency. She changed her mind within hours. The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a federal law, was passed in 1978 to protect the rights of Native American children, who were being removed illegally from tribes and reservations and being placed with White families. The law says that a Native American mother can't consent to an adoption until 10 days after the birth and that she can revoke her consent anytime before the adoption is final. Under Illinois state law, however, a consent to adoption is irrevocable after 72 hours. The mother had told Easter House that she was an American Indian, but the agency did not follow ICWA procedures and refused to help rescind the adoption.
"They told me I could change my mind," she said. "I felt betrayed." The agency's lawyer said the agency acted legally.
The people who were going to adopt the boy agreed to give him back because they said they did not believe that protracted litigation in Illinois courts would be in the best interest of the child.
Sources:
Jeff Flock. "Native American Woman Sues to Revoke Adoption," CNN, Transcript #1084-6. Section News: Domestic. Show: News 10:26 pm et. January 3, 1995.
"In Circuit Court," Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, January 26, 1995.
Andrew Fegelman, "Adoptive Couple Agree to Give Up Infant." Chicago Tribune, Section Metro Northwest, Pg. 4; Zone NW, February 2, 1995.
Lou Ortiz, "Mom Sues to Reverse Son's Adoption; Indian Child Welfare Act Cited." Chicago Sun-Times, Section News; P. 14, Feb 2, 1995.
M.A. Stapleton. "Adoption dispute ended in best interests of child. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, P. 1, February 1, 1995.
BLOGGER changed, not allowing us to UPDATE this back-up blog
(UPDATED 726/2025) issues with blogger are preventing this
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
click
Contact Trace
CALLED HOME: Book Contributors - republished in 2025
CALLED HOME: Book Contributors : We are honored that these adoptees (or relatives of adoptees) contributed to CALLED HOME: Suzie ...

-
Published on Sep 28, 2013 This 40-minute documentary explains the reason for and the process of creating and implementing ...
-
By Melanie Payne ( mpayne@news-press.com ) August 15, 2010 Alexis Stevens liked to describe herself as a model citizen. She was adopted fr...
-
By Mary Charles I somehow don't believe the intention was for us (adoptees) to find our homes using DNA. But when I came across t...
-
Suzette Brewer 7/24/14 INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY MEDIA Baby A has been adrift in foster care for years. Born in No...
-
By: Shannon Logan Feb 07, 2014 Leland Morrill was estranged from h...
-
Port Gamble S'Klallam Obtain Full Control Over Child Welfare Matters Posted on March 29, 2012 After a decade-long effort in conju...
-
Editor NOTE: This is one of our most popular posts so we are reblogging it. If you do know where Michael Schwartz is, please leave a com...
-
Capobiancos Sue Dusten Brown for Nearly Half a Million in Fees Suzette Brewer September 25, 2013 As Matt and Melanie...
-
By Trace A. DeMeyer OK, as promised, I have more thoughts after I went to the hallowed halls of Yale Law School last Friday to he...
-
By Trace L Hentz, blog editor I have often wondered about how we adoptees were affected by our adoptions, as far as our mental health. (I ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
tell us your thoughts!